The Apocalypse - Letter by Letter
Blog to discuss the book "The Apocalypse - Letter by Letter: A Literary Analysis of the Book of Revelation" and current events that point to the events described therein.
Thursday, October 27, 2011
Sunday, October 23, 2011
Making a (Mole)Hill out of a Mountain
In Chapter 12 of The Apocalypse - Letter by Letter, the author refutes those who claim that Rome and The Catholic Church are "The Beast". He points out their errant understanding of what the 7 mountains represent, and shows that the translation to 7 hills is incorrect. Here is an excerpt:
The noun “ὄρος” [oros] can signify either a mountain OR a hill, according to the dictionary. According to Isaiah 41:15, God differentiates between threshing mountains and making hills like chaff, which is to say that God knows the difference between a mountain and a hill, just as he knows there are big fish and little fish. In this case, therefore, it is neither otiose nor odd to note how others differentiate between “ὄρος” and “ὄρος.” Some translators, like those for The New American Bible, have rendered “ἑπτὰ ὄρη” [epta orë], in verse 9, as “seven hills” instead of “seven mountains.” This is strange, passing strange, because, as far as I could find, those translators for the NAB, in all other instances throughout the New Testament, rendered the very same noun as “mountain”--aye, aye, even in Apocalypse 8:8. The last time I saw, Apocalypse 13:7 stated,
The noun “ὄρος” [oros] can signify either a mountain OR a hill, according to the dictionary. According to Isaiah 41:15, God differentiates between threshing mountains and making hills like chaff, which is to say that God knows the difference between a mountain and a hill, just as he knows there are big fish and little fish. In this case, therefore, it is neither otiose nor odd to note how others differentiate between “ὄρος” and “ὄρος.” Some translators, like those for The New American Bible, have rendered “ἑπτὰ ὄρη” [epta orë], in verse 9, as “seven hills” instead of “seven mountains.” This is strange, passing strange, because, as far as I could find, those translators for the NAB, in all other instances throughout the New Testament, rendered the very same noun as “mountain”--aye, aye, even in Apocalypse 8:8. The last time I saw, Apocalypse 13:7 stated,
“...It was given authority over every tribe and people and language and nation...”
That spells out “emperor” and tells about an “empire.” This situation reminds me of what the chain gang warden in the movie, “Cool Hand Luke,” said, “What we've got here, is--failure to communicate.” The Great Harlot and the Beast are separate entities; the Beast's seven heads epitomize the Beast's history, not hers. The “ἑπτὰ ὄρη” are SYMBOLICAL; relative to the Great Harlot, they represent...
“peoples and multitudes and nations and languages.”
It is recklessness to render “ἑπτὰ ὄρη” as “seven hills” simply because the city of Rome sits on seven hills. John himself wondered with great wonder, mainly, on account of the name Babylon. But, as it sat then, regarding the real names of both the seventh Beast and the Great Harlot, so it sits now: only Time will tell, for John did not tattle, and that he someday will stands not within the prospect of belief. Yet, it seems some people cannot stand sitting.
Apparently, latitude in the noun's definition admitted the attitude of the translators to an alteration in altitude. I do not know whether the translators, when they trampled down the little big noun, acted out of nescience or acted out of knowledge: if the former be the case, I would offer them each a box of soft, sweet raisins as food for thought, but I do not think that they, as yet, believe in cannibalism; and, if the latter be the case, they have already long indulged in the vile practice; whilst, in either case, I remind them of the final warning in 22:18-19.
They moved “mountains” to Babylon the Great--aye, seven of them, simultaneously!-- notwithstanding that six existed in auld lang syne, noncontemporaneously: a feat of transition with such attrition as reduced them to “hills,” instantaneously. I think the little Beast himself, when he comes with many signs and wonders, shall not be able to perform the like.
I will speak bluntly: To opine regarding Scripture is to assert the words of one's own heart and substitute them for the words of the God. This act reveals such contumacy and contumely as should shock even a weak conscience; it is an act of blasphemy, a violation of the First Great Commandment, and the sin against the Holy Spirit. The Apocalypse is a gift from above, and every gift from above is good. Therefore, if one is having a bad time with the Apocalypse, it is not the Apocalypse that is giving one a bad time, but oneself that is giving a bad time to the Apocalypse. Originally and ultimately speaking, the Apocalypse and the parables in the gospels have the same Author; that Author gave them in the same symbolical manner, for the same reason. If the reader is interested in knowing that reason, I refer him or her to Matthew 13:
10 And his disciples came and said to him: Why speakest thou to them in parables? 11 Who answered and said to them: Because to you it is given to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven: but to them it is not given. 12 For he that hath, to him shall be given, and he shall abound: but he that hath not, from him shall be taken away that also which he hath. 13 Therefore do I speak to them in parables: because seeing they see not, and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand. 14 And the prophecy of Isaias is fulfilled in them, who saith: By hearing you shall hear, and shall not understand: and seeing you shall see, and shall not perceive. 15 For the heart of this people is grown gross, and with their ears they have been dull of hearing, and their eyes they have shut: lest at any time they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and understand with their heart, and be converted, and I should heal them.
Then and now, but not just now and then, can it be said, “What we've got here, is-- failure to communicate.” And, it is eternally certain that the failure comes not on the part of the Amen. If my words have stung, then I am a good gadfly.
Saturday, October 22, 2011
The Lukewarm Shall Be Expelled
Laodicea was a principal city of Asia Minor for banking, commerce, and industries, with specialties in sandals, eye salve, and woolen goods from black sheep. Six miles across the Lycos valley were the hot springs of Hierapolis [the name means “sacred city”], whose waters flowed down from Mt. Salbacos, became lukewarm as they crossed a plateau, then fell down a cliff, depositing a white crust of lime on its face.
The Laodiceans had a spirit of independence and self-sufficiency on account of their wealth. When an earthquake destroyed the city in 60 AD, the rich citizenry turned down an imperial offer of help and by themselves built the city anew.
Laodicea received from the emperor the title of free city, and Roman authorities were under orders not to trouble the Jewish community there; for the Jews contributed annually to the imperial coffers. Hence, the financial importance of Laodicea forfended persecution against the local church, also. It would be naive to think the members of the Christian community, including the bishop, did not directly or indirectly participate in the city's prosperity. It would also be naive to think that the wealth and the long sense of self-sufficiency did not affect the Christians in their relationship with God. So, Christ's words to the bishop apply as fully to his flock, and those words are to be understood in both the material and spiritual senses.
It is a point of historical interest that St. Paul ordered his letter to Colossae be read in Laodicea, and his letter to Laodicea be read in Colassae [Colossians 4:16]. His letters clearly indicate that the Christians in the three neighboring cities of Colossae, Hierapolis, and Laodicea were secure.
Christ began his address to the bishop with the phrase, “Thus saith the Amen,” which refers to the Old Testament formula, “Thus saith the Lord,” a formula used by the prophets to introduce a message, which would contain, at least, in part, statements from God about his activity in the future. The Church ends a prayer, creed, or other formal statement, with the term “Amen” to express solemn ratification [so be it] or agreement [it is so]. The Hebrew word “amen” literally means “certainly” or “certainty.” By the time John received the Apocalypse in 95-96 AD, the Amen was familiar to anyone who had read the gospels or had heard them read, because, as is recorded in the gospels, Jesus used it, frequently. Indeed, he made the Amen personal to himself, as he did the “stone” or “rock” in Daniel 2; therefore, the term is inseparable from him as the Mystery of the God, whose purpose is to bring the “kingdom of the heaven” over the whole earth.
The Amen points backward, for example, to Isaiah 65, especially, verses 16-17, He who takes an oath in the land shall swear by the God of truth; for the hardships of the past shall be forgotten, and hidden from my eyes. Behold! I am about to create a new heaven and a new earth; the things of the past shall not be remembered or come to mind. The term also points forward to the Millennium and the New Jerusalem, in Apocalypse 21:1-2,
And I saw a new heaven and a new earth. For the first heaven and the first earth passed away and the sea is no more. And I saw the city the holy [one] New Jerusalem coming down from the heaven from the God, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband.
Thus, the term “Amen” connotes the renewal of all things; and the phrase, “Thus saith the Amen,” means that Christ swore by himself: for he is the new Adam, “the witness faithful and true,” and “the beginning/origin of the creation of the God,” who has all power and authority to bring the Father's plan to fulfillment.
Hence, Christ immediately intimated to the bishop:
(1) that the words to follow would be absolutely true and certain;
(2) that they would concern the bishop's urgent need of renewal;
(3) that they would tell the consequence of failure to repent:
a) especially, for the bishop and his congregation, in the near future,
b) more especially, for the general Church in the time of the seventh
seal,
c) and, most especially, for the Church in the time of the seventh
trumpet.
Bear in mind that Christ deliberately made the message to Laodicea letter number SEVEN. His words were most solemn; the Eternal Truth and Certainty uttered them to Laodicea and, in fact, to the Whole Church for all generations to come. To the bishop, to everyone, Christ has delivered the ultimatum of either life or death, with little time left to choose--forever.
Persecution under the Emperor Trajan came to Asia Minor in 113 AD. Trajan was famous for riding a white horse; he was the first of the “four horsemen” mentioned in Chapter 6: for thus had said the Amen, “I am about to vomit you out of my mouth.” It is obvious that Christ used symbolical terms when he informed the bishop, “You are lukewarm and neither hot nor cold.”
The three adjectives are each to be understood as indicial of spiritual condition or state He had been instructed in the Way of the Lord and with ardent spirit, spoke and taught accurately about Jesus, although he knew only the baptism of John. [Acts 18:25];
Do not grow slack in zeal, be fervent in spirit, serve the Lord. [Rom. 12:11];
and, in turn, the condition or state is to be understood as measured according to only one model or standard: Jesus Christ. He is the exemplar omnibus [the example for all], the one who persevered perfectly in obedient love, who faithfully and truly kept the two great commandants, even to death on the cross.
It is plausible that Christ had in mind the nearby city of Hierapolis, for the descendent temperature of the waters of its springs, from hot to lukewarm to cold, corresponds with the descendent terrain: from Hierapolis on the mountain of Salbacos, to the plateau lower down, to the cliff; and these things aptly represent the bishop's situation.
In the Bible, “water” symbolizes spiritual life. Lukewarm “water” can provoke nausea; hence, the tepid bishop is nauseous to Christ. The bishop is midway between the “sacred city” higher up on the “mountain” and the “fall” over the cliff. He has reached a plateau in his spiritual life, in the sense that he does not seek to advance in sanctity. He regards himself as levelheaded; and, what Christ considers nauseatingly neither “hot” nor “cold,” the bishop deems well-balanced and comfortable and not fanatical, but reasonable.
He has deluded himself into thinking his life is perfect and does not need any change; indeed, he thinks himself rich and secure. He is free from the troubles and weaknesses in other churches: there are no Nicolaites or Jezebels or heretics or other bothers among his people. All goes well and, he reckons, will continue so. Thus does he say in his heart, “I am rich and I have prospered and I have need of nothing.”
How unaccommodating is his memory to what Christ said on this matter, “Amen I say to you that a rich man will enter with difficulty into the kingdom of the heaven. And again I say to you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle [metaphor: one of the low, arched entrances in the wall around Jerusalem] than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of the God.” [Mt. 19:23-24]
And seeing the crowds, he went up onto a mountain, and as he was seating himself they came close to him the ones being taught by him: and opening his mouth he instructed them, saying, “Blessed are the poor in spirit, for of them is the kingdom of the heaven.”
[Mt. 5:1-3]
Like the water flowing across the plateau, the bishop is falling little by little--toward the cliff. His prince of principles is ne quid nimis, “nothing to excess”; and that is the maxim of the world, the typically human. “There is some good and some bad in every man,” saith he, as he continues falling, falling, falling. It is true that a man can be both good and bad, at any particular point in life; but, it is not true that a man can become both good and bad, at the same time. The spiritual life has a motto, “Grow or die,” like that of the French Foreign Legion, “March or die.”
In the bishop's heart is secret pride and arrogance: that the riches he has are HIS; that the prosperity he enjoys was achieved by HIM; and, therefore, nothing is needed by HIM. Thrice did Christ repeat the idea of “I,” hinting that the bishop is not God, and that he has no authority to give the name “good” to anyone or anything. Adam and Eve tried that.
A man, by means of himself alone, cannot be or become good. The bishop's words, “I have need of nothing,” express what Christ abhors: self-exaltation. The insolence, the insult, of that word “nothing”!!! For such is the speech of sin, that Christ is--nothing. I think the rest of the letter is clear enough, certainly Christ's loving and kind counsel to the bishop, on how to correct his condition. Christ saved until last his admonition to the Church, for all its future history, “Let the one having an ear hear what the Spirit is saying to the churches!”
The letter's contents, emphatically, the phrase, “at the door,” and the clause, “I am about to vomit you out of my mouth,” are most especially applicable to the Church in the generation or two or three before the advent of the Beast of Chapter 13. Only the spiritually ignorant think that so much scientific knowledge, being used to make so much material wealth in the world, is not dangerous. Indeed, it will give rise to Babylon the Great.
As the letter to Laodicea intimates, and, as later Chapters will show, a major sign preceding the “birth pangs” will be a period of ever increasing wealth, much greater than the human race has ever known; correspondingly, faith will decrease and charity will grow colder. Why, look there and here: it has, already, made its initial appearance. So, this section of the commentary's third part ended where it began,
And there was given to me a reed like a rod, as he was saying, “Come and measure the sanctuary of the God and the altar and the ones worshipping in it. And the court the one on the outside of the sanctuary cast outside and measure it not, for it was given to the nations, and the city the holy one they will be trampling for forty-two months.
In relation to 11:1-2, and in adumbration of Chapters 17, 12, & 13, a statement from Moses is appropriate,
If there arises among you a prophet or a dreamer who promises a sign or wonder, urging you to follow other gods, whom you have not known, or to serve them: even though the sign or wonder he has foretold you comes to pass, pay no attention to the words of that prophet or dreamer; for the Lord, your God, is testing you, to learn whether you truly love him with all your heart and with all your soul. [Dt.13:2-4]
It has been shown that the second woe will unfold in three phases:
(1) the 200 Million Horsemen,
(2) the measuring of the sanctuary in the Church, and
(3) the tract of 42 months or 1260 days, during which the nations will be trampling Jerusalem and the Two Witnesses will be evangelizing throughout the world.
The measuring of the sanctuary and the coming of the Beast are subjects too important to be confined within a few verses in Chapter 11. Hence, it should not surprise, at all, that the former and the latter are expanded in Chapters 12 and 13, respectively: as 11:1-2 relates to 11:3-13, so all of Chapter 12 relates to all of Chapter 13. However, to abbreviate the commentary and to alleviate the task of typing with two fingers, I will leap ahead to Chapter 17, wherein an angel explains the chief symbols wherewith to make brief and relief of Chapters 12 and 13. I will do this after demonstrating that the Beast in Chapter 17 is the same Beast in 13:1 and in 11, and that Chapter 13 chronologically, not just numerically, follows 12.
Labels:
false prophet,
Laodicea
Sunday, October 16, 2011
Reed and Tail and the False Prophet
Steve always said to use the Bible as your sole reference for understanding the Apocalypse, though he also did his best to stay true to Catholic tradition and the Sacred Liturgy. You see it in his writing.
Satan, the Antichrist, and the False Prophet form a type of anti-Trinity. To unmask them from the symbols in the Apocalypse, Steve pointed to writings by the prophets as with this one by Isaiah:
So the Lord severs from Israel head and tail, palm branch and reed in one day.
[The elder and the noble are the head, the prophet who teaches falsehood is the
tail] [Is. 9:13-14]
Likewise, the elder and the noble are the palm branch, and the prophet who teaches
falsehood is the reed.
So when you encounter activities that include the terms "reed" or "tail" in th Apocalypse you are most likely reading abut the False Prophet or false prophets in general.
Two such passages are of critical importance in understanding the sequence of events in the Apocalypse.
In Chapter 11 it says:
“And was given me a reed like a rod, as he said, “Come and measure the sanctuary
of God and the altar and the ones worshipping in it. And the court the
outside of the sanctuary cast outside and not it measure, for it was given
to the nations, and the city the holy they will be trampling months forty-two.
And I will give to the two witnesses of me and they will be prophesying days thousand
two hundred sixty, all-clothed of sackcloth.”
The term "reed like a rod" should catch your attention. It is a reference to Isaiah and alludes to the nature and activity of the False Prophet. Basically it says the laity will be forced to choose between the true teaching of the Church and the false teaching of Antichrist as delivered by the False Prophet.
Interestingly, in Chapter 12, where the Great Sign is seen "in the heaven" a reference is made to "the tail of the Dragon". Hmm, we just mentioned that the terms reed and tail both are types of the false prophet.
4 And the tail of it [of the dragon] dragged by force [σύρει = surei] the third of
the stars of the heaven and cast out [ἔβαλεν = ebalen] them unto the earth, and
the dragon took his stand [aorist] in the presence of the woman the one about to
bear so that when she bore he might devour the thing born of/from her [τὸ
τέκνον αὐτῆς = to tekhnon autës]. 5 And she bore [aorist] a son virile, who is
about to shepherd all the nations with an iron rod. And snatched away was
[aorist] the thing born of/from her [τὸ τέκνον αὐτῆς = to tekhnon autës] to the
God and to the throne of him.
So Steve shows that reed in Chapter 11 "measures" the outer court of the Church, those too weak in their faith to resist his false doctrine - probably loosening restrictions on divorce, gay marriage, abortion, women priests, celibacy, etc. - and "casts them outside".
And he shows how in Chapter 12 the tail of the dragon drags by force - the force of his charisma - one third of the college of cardinals down to earth (out of the heaven).
Might these two scenes actually be different perspectives of the same event? Might they be the same time? It seems more than likely that the laity and the apostate clergy all depart the Church at the same time, pulled irresistibly by the False prophet and his promises of salvation in a worldly doctrine along the lines of "if it makes you feel good, do it". We're most of the way there now except there are still ripe pickings amongst the lukewarm inside the Church. It's happened before but this will be the final schism, the last time the faithful are forced to choose.
By most reports, surveys find up to 90% of today's Catholic laity practice or support artificial birth control. Up to 50% support abortion and 60% of baptized Catholics voted for the candidate in the last election that has since passed regulations forcing Catholic schools and hospitals to offer elective sterilization and abortifacient drugs to their employees.
How many will follow the False Prophet and his Cardinals and clergy? Te Apocalypse doesn't say but it is clear that event, the Great Sign. casts the world into the greatest spiritual crisis in it's history.
Labels:
Antichrist,
Apostasy,
false prophet
Wednesday, October 12, 2011
200 Million Horsemen and Disordered Mobs
Of course the answer everyone wants is "what time are we in with respect to the Apocalypse?"
And Steve was meticulous in piecing that together. For him to be right, the papal assassination would not occur until some other things come to pass, namely the time of 200 million horsemen.
As I read and re-read many times over, it seems the 200 million are not all military but include "agents and agencies," ones that include military power. Kramer called them secret societies and communists. We see in our time how wars develop with economic and political motives, sometimes hidden from public view.
And Steve was meticulous in piecing that together. For him to be right, the papal assassination would not occur until some other things come to pass, namely the time of 200 million horsemen.
As I read and re-read many times over, it seems the 200 million are not all military but include "agents and agencies," ones that include military power. Kramer called them secret societies and communists. We see in our time how wars develop with economic and political motives, sometimes hidden from public view.
The Vatican warned that the Iraq War was unjust and would lead to secondary or collateral effects, especially persecution of Christians. Sadly, they were right. In Egypt and elsewhere in the world, Christians have borne the brunt of new-found "freedom". And here in the U.S. our own elected officials have legislated or passed regulations violating Christian conscience.
So are we already in the time of the 200 million horsemen?
Another clue to the times we're in can be fund in a single Greek word. Steve wrote:
"A translation more accurate than “multitudes” for the odd noun [okhloi] is “disordered crowds” or “mobs.” The Greek term refers to the bloody persecution in Asia and Africa, and, perhaps, to social turmoil in some places after the event of the 200 Million Horsemen earlier [9:15-19]."
And around the globe we are seeing just such a scene. Multitudes protesting in the streets, in some cases not even able to articulate what they want.
A news reporter yesterday almost made me come out of my chair. He said, "What the world seems to need now is a charismatic leader to pull it out of this."
We'll be getting one all right. Stay tuned.
Another clue to the times we're in can be fund in a single Greek word. Steve wrote:
"A translation more accurate than “multitudes” for the odd noun [okhloi] is “disordered crowds” or “mobs.” The Greek term refers to the bloody persecution in Asia and Africa, and, perhaps, to social turmoil in some places after the event of the 200 Million Horsemen earlier [9:15-19]."
And around the globe we are seeing just such a scene. Multitudes protesting in the streets, in some cases not even able to articulate what they want.
A news reporter yesterday almost made me come out of my chair. He said, "What the world seems to need now is a charismatic leader to pull it out of this."
We'll be getting one all right. Stay tuned.
Labels:
200 Million Horsemen,
mobs
Monday, October 10, 2011
The Way to the Bottomless Pit
Steve often said he wouldn't tell us the obvious but leave some things for us to figure out for ourselves. So he never dove deep into Chapter 9 where it says:
[1] And the fifth angel sounded the trumpet, and I saw a star fall from heaven upon the earth, and there was given to him the key of the bottomless pit. [2] And he opened the bottomless pit: and the smoke of the pit arose, as the smoke of a great furnace; and the sun and the air were darkened with the smoke of the pit. [3] And from the smoke of the pit there came out locusts upon the earth. And power was given to them, as the scorpions of the earth have power: [4] And it was commanded them that they should not hurt the grass of the earth, nor any green thing, nor any tree: but only the men who have not the sign of God on their foreheads. [5] And it was given unto them that they should not kill them; but that they should torment them five months: and their torment was as the torment of a scorpion when he striketh a man.
But in describing the end of this phase, he looks back and says this:
John wrote he...
“saw an angel coming down from heaven, holding the key of the abyss and agreat chain.”
The angel here is not the “mighty angel” in 10:1, but, probably, a cardinal or bishop. I say this, because John used the definite article with the noun “key,” referring to that “key” given to the “fallen star,” Martin Luther, in 9:1, “the key of the shaft of the abyss.” The “key” symbolizes the authority to open or close the shaft of the abyss; and, since it was an apostate member of the clergy who opened the shaft, it is fitting a member of the clergy should close it again.
In verses 2-3, the angel seized the Dragon, Satan, and “bound him a thousand years,” i.e., bound him in such manner as would hold Satan for a “thousand years”; and, then, the angel...
“cast him out into the abyss, and locked it and sealed it after him, that he might not still deceive the nations until the thousand years could be ended. After these things it is necessary he be loosed for a short time.”
Note that the duration of Satan's internment in the abyss is set before he is cast into the abyss, which simply connotes that God is omniscient. The key symbolizes the Church's authority over the abyss, and the chain symbolizes her power to hold Satan and his demons. The Church alone can bring peace and plenty and security to mankind. If men are left to the authority and power of the Church, and do her teachings, then, they will make a society, a civilization that will approach as close to perfect as possible for the offspring of God. If not, then not. So, the first time Christ bound Satan; the next time His Church will chain him.
St. Paul wrote,
If there is a body of the soul [soma psykhikon, i.e., the psychosomatic], there is a body of the spirit [soma pneumatikon, i.e., the pneumatosomatic]. And thus is it written, “The first man Adam became unto a living soul, the last Adam unto a life-giving spirit. But not first [is] the one of the spirit but the one of the soul, then the one of the spirit. The first man [was] dust from the earth, the second man from heaven. [1 Cor. 15:44-47]
The bride is clothed in “bright, clean linen,” and the “linen” is the righteous deeds of the saints; ergo, the saints, collectively, are the bride of the Little Lamb, Jesus Christ. Clearly, the saints are the Church, the mystical body of Christ, the bride, as St. Paul repeats what Christ said, “For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two will become one flesh.” This is a great mystery, and I am applying it to Christ and his Church. [Eph. 5:31-32]
Again, St. Paul indicated that the bride of Christ is the members of the Church,
For I am jealous with God's jealousy toward you, for I promised you to one husband, to be presented as a chaste virgin to Christ. [2 Cor. 11:2]
As it was in the beginning, is now, and ever shall be, even to the end of the world, Christ cannot have more than one bride, lest he commit the sin of adultery; and yet, in this last year of the twentieth century, some 2500 denominations individually aver, “I am the bride of Christ!”
Judge for yourselves, ye Friends, the signs of these times, when hundreds and hundreds of
millions testify, “You, Jesus Christ, are a fornicator, like us!” Contemplate earnestly, therefore,
what is coming, and make ready.
So Luther is described as a "falling star" with the key to the bottomless pit. And who can argue about the destruction Protestantism has wreaked on the Church. First just a difference in doctrine like the supremacy of the papacy, or Apostolic succession. Then discarding the dogma of the True Presence, "ordination" of homosexuals. The next thing you find is that the fastest growing segment is faithlessness caused by the complete loss of spiritual bearing. Luther has a lot to answer for. If you follow any of these counterfeit religions, so will you.
Labels:
Abyss,
Luther,
Protestantism,
Star
Sunday, October 09, 2011
When heaven isn't Heaven
The problem with translation is the perspective of the translator. When faced with a choice of meanings of a word the invariably force an opinion on it. And the problem with translations used by the Church is their propensity to use "experts" likely out of fear of being accused of being unlearned or unsophisticated.
And so somehow we ended up with the distortion of the most critical sentence in the Apocalypse, the one dealing with the great sign.
After centuries of being told in Apocalypse 12:1 that "...a great sign appeared in heaven..." a few years ago we suddenly found the sign elsewhere, indeed a little lower. Now "A great sign appeared in the sky..." The Greek word loosely transliterated as ouranos can indeed have both meanings. But in the New Testament in countless paragraphs and verses, it is almost always translated as heaven unless the context clearly indicates an earthly location or reason.
So why does it matter? Well, if you are interested in actually witnessing this sign, you could be looking in all the wrong places.
Steve wrote:
So, when John informs us that "...A great sign appeared in the heaven..." he is telling us the sign is in the Church. Note also the use of the definite article to indicate THE HEAVEN. That may be what threw the translators off. Steve spends an entire chapter decoding this sign in the book. If you're looking for it in the sky, you're going to be disappointed.
And so somehow we ended up with the distortion of the most critical sentence in the Apocalypse, the one dealing with the great sign.
After centuries of being told in Apocalypse 12:1 that "...a great sign appeared in heaven..." a few years ago we suddenly found the sign elsewhere, indeed a little lower. Now "A great sign appeared in the sky..." The Greek word loosely transliterated as ouranos can indeed have both meanings. But in the New Testament in countless paragraphs and verses, it is almost always translated as heaven unless the context clearly indicates an earthly location or reason.
So why does it matter? Well, if you are interested in actually witnessing this sign, you could be looking in all the wrong places.
Steve wrote:
In Isaiah 34:5, God said to the prophet,
“When my sword has drunk its fill in heaven, lo, it shall come down in judgment
upon Edom…”
God was talking about the theocracy; nota bene the expression “come down.” Jesus called His Church “the kingdom of heaven” [Mt.16:18-19]. John calls it “the kingdom” in Chapter 1 of the Apocalypse; in Chapter 4 and in many others, he simply calls it “heaven” [7:10; 9:1; 12:1;13:6; 19:14; 21:7].
Moreover, the “kingdom of heaven” is in two “places.” In Dan. 2:31-45, King
Nebuchadnezzar had a dream: a stone hewn out of a MOUNTAIN smashed a statue of various metals, beginning with its feet; and, then, the stone became a MOUNTAIN that covered the entire earth. The prophet explained that the “stone” represented the everlasting kingdom, which the “God of heaven” would set up.
Hence, there is the “kingdom of heaven” in eternity, and there is the “kingdom of
heaven” on earth. This fact is corroborated in Chapter 10 of the Apocalypse, where a mighty angel comes down from “heaven” into “heaven,” and also in Chapter 12, where the male child is “snatched up” from “heaven” into “heaven,” and in verse 12 that reads,
“Rejoice then, you HEAVENS and those who dwell in THEM!”
Therefore, unless context indicates otherwise, the term “heaven” in the Apocalypse means THE CHURCH.
So, when John informs us that "...A great sign appeared in the heaven..." he is telling us the sign is in the Church. Note also the use of the definite article to indicate THE HEAVEN. That may be what threw the translators off. Steve spends an entire chapter decoding this sign in the book. If you're looking for it in the sky, you're going to be disappointed.
When the Woman is Not a Woman
A contentious claim in the book, The Apocalypse - Letter by Letter is that the Woman Clothed With the Sun is NOT the Virgin Mary but rather is the Church herself, of which Mary is a type.
Steve wrote:
In 12:2 it says "and being with child, she cried travailing in birth, and was in pain to be delivered."
Curious. We know that pain in childbirth is the curse of Eve for disobedience. We call that original sin. It says in Genesis 2:16 "To the woman also he said: I will multiply thy sorrows, and thy conceptions: in sorrow shalt thou bring forth children,..."
But last time I looked, the unerring dogma of the Catholic Church is that Mary was conceived without sin in what is called the Immaculate Conception. And nowhere in the bible does it state that she suffered any pain in labor. So how can so many inside the Church claim that the Woman Clothed with the Sun is Mary?
Steve goes on to explain both the time of the sign and it's meaning. Was she making it up? Did he receive a private revelation? No. He was relating to me what he had learned by reading the Church fathers and older bibles, information that was cast aside or lost in the rush to dumb down Catholicism for the masses, a disastrous approach to teaching put forth at Vatican II.
Next: "When heaven isn't Heaven"
Steve wrote:
A long time ago, in a mind far, far away, there sprang an opinion. Since then, many
hundreds of millions of people have propagated that opinion and perpetuated it into an inveterate tradition throughout the Church, to wit, that "the woman clothed with the sun" is the Blessed Virgin Mary.
I would gladly agree with the many hundreds of millions who assert that 12:1 describes Mary, if I could with impunity take that verse out of its context. But, John warned rue not to add one word to the prophecy and not to subtract one word from it, as stated in 22:18-19; and, surely, what applies to one word in the prophecy must apply to a whole verse.
Perhaps, the many millions are tacitly asserting that Mary became Queen of Heaven
before Jesus was born, and that, therefore, either Mary or Saint Dominic confused the order of the glorious mysteries in the Rosary, so that the Coronation should precede the Assumption.
Frankly, I find it a mystery that such an opinion about 12:1 has become the first reading in the Mass celebrated on the Feast of the Assumption.
But this virgin has characteristics that Mary does not. Let's look closer.
In 12:2 it says "and being with child, she cried travailing in birth, and was in pain to be delivered."
Curious. We know that pain in childbirth is the curse of Eve for disobedience. We call that original sin. It says in Genesis 2:16 "To the woman also he said: I will multiply thy sorrows, and thy conceptions: in sorrow shalt thou bring forth children,..."
But last time I looked, the unerring dogma of the Catholic Church is that Mary was conceived without sin in what is called the Immaculate Conception. And nowhere in the bible does it state that she suffered any pain in labor. So how can so many inside the Church claim that the Woman Clothed with the Sun is Mary?
Steve goes on to explain both the time of the sign and it's meaning. Was she making it up? Did he receive a private revelation? No. He was relating to me what he had learned by reading the Church fathers and older bibles, information that was cast aside or lost in the rush to dumb down Catholicism for the masses, a disastrous approach to teaching put forth at Vatican II.
Next: "When heaven isn't Heaven"
Friday, March 18, 2011
Muslim World: Revolution! (for Muslim Arabs only)
People have taken to the streets in Arab countries to topple repressive regimes and set up democratic governments – such is the consensus in the West. But will these new Arab democracies, should they ever come into being, embody significant changes regarding non-Muslim or non- Arab minorities? Discrimination against the other – the one who is not a Muslim Arab – or the refusal to accept the other, is one of the more complex political and ethical issues in the Middle East and North Africa, even though it is rarely mentioned.
Now that a revolutionary wave is sweeping across the Arab world, one must ask whether the revolution is for all or for Muslim Arabs alone.
The Middle East and North Africa are home to millions of national and religious minorities living under Arab occupation since the seventh century; they are still waiting for equality or fighting for independence. The Kurds are among the oldest peoples in the world, and they have kept their identity through centuries of Arab and Ottoman occupation.
Read the rest here: Muslim World: Revolution! (for Muslim Arabs only)
Now that a revolutionary wave is sweeping across the Arab world, one must ask whether the revolution is for all or for Muslim Arabs alone.
The Middle East and North Africa are home to millions of national and religious minorities living under Arab occupation since the seventh century; they are still waiting for equality or fighting for independence. The Kurds are among the oldest peoples in the world, and they have kept their identity through centuries of Arab and Ottoman occupation.
Read the rest here: Muslim World: Revolution! (for Muslim Arabs only)
Labels:
Burning Mountain,
Islam
Friday, April 09, 2010
UN Judge: Pope Should be Prosecuted at International Criminal Court for "Crimes against Humanity"
By Susan Yoshihara, Ph.D.
April 8, 2010 (C-FAM) - In London last Friday, a high ranking United Nations (UN) jurist called on the British government to detain Pope Benedict XVI during his upcoming visit to Britain, and send him to trial in the International Criminal Court (ICC) for “crimes against humanity.”
Geoffrey Robertson touted his status as a UN judge in an article he published last week, in which he argued that jurists should invoke the same procedures that have been used to indict war criminals such as Slobodan Milosevic, to try the Pope as head of the Roman Catholic Church, who he said is ultimately responsible for sexual abuse of children by Catholic priests.
Robertson is one of five select jurists in the UN’s internal justice system responsible for holding UN officials accountable for corruption and mismanagement. His article was published in both the United States and Britain and reported on by the Associated Press.Professor Hurst Hannum of the Fletcher School at Tufts University told C-Fam's Friday Fax that it would be a “real stretch” to use the ICC, since that court’s jurisdiction is mainly reserved for crimes during war. More likely, Hannum said, is that Robertson and likeminded experts would invoke the principle of “universal jurisdiction,” so that national courts all over the world could detain the pope whenever he stepped foot on their soil. Critics say the principle, already used in practice, is a violation of sovereignty as it is enshrined in the UN Charter.
Yet Robertson insisted that the ICC could be used as long as the Pope’s sovereign immunity was waived and as long as jurists can show that the sex abuse scandal was carried out on a “widespread or systematic scale,” in a similar way that child soldiers were used in the wars in Sierra Leone and the way that sex slaves are traded internationally.
Robertson, a tort lawyer, argued that prosecution at a higher level of the Church is necessary to get more money for victims of clergy sexual abuse in cases where dioceses have gone into bankruptcy. He specifically pointed out the fact that the diocese of Los Angeles has already paid $660M in damages and Boston has paid $100M.
One prominent law professor told the Friday Fax, “Without in any way minimizing the seriousness of the alleged offenses of Catholic priests, it would be a grave mistake to the laws of human rights to permit a trivializing of the responsibility to protect, and to play into the hands of American contingency-fee lawyers.”
Another human rights lawyer told the Friday Fax that the article could be part of a broader campaign. Robertson has long campaigned to strip the Holy See of its permanent observer status at the UN, and has publicly referred to the Holy See “the world’s largest NGO.”
When a campaign was launched to oust the Holy See from its status in 1999, UN Member States rallied around the Vatican, and in 2004 the General Assembly voted unanimously to expand that status. It is unclear whether UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon knew about Robertson’s leanings before appointing him to his current position.
This article reprinted with permission from www.c-fam.org
URL: http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2010/apr/10040810.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




